Lately there seems to be a new glut of people claiming that they or their loved ones is/are autistic. It’s gotten to be a trendy diagnosis, particularly for medical practitioners who have only a passing knowledge of what the autism syndrome entails. So while I’ve been meaning to write this blog for a long time now, I’ve been reluctant to because some of my personal loved ones were recently diagnosed by, frankly, someone who wasn’t qualified to do so.
Up until recently, if someone told me they were autistic I took it at face value. It was usually easy to tell in person anyways. But lately a lot of people are claiming they were diagnosed as autistic but never underwent any testing nor do they exhibit any of autism’s telltale signs.
I reached for my autism diagnosis because it was the only remaining explanation that made my experiences since childhood make sense. I saw a woman with a doctorate in psychology and psychiatry and underwent hours of tests. On top of tests for autism, there were tests for intelligence, executive function, depression, anxiety, and more serious psychological disorders, a list of my stims and sensory sensitivities, followed by an interview of my mother to affirm my childhood experiences under her roof. I was formally diagnosed and received a letter from the tester that I did, in fact, meet the criteria for the type of autism (Autism Level 1) previously known as Asperger’s.
The basic criteria for autism are: persistent social difficulties, out of sync intelligence tests (in my case, high verbal comprehension but low visual comprehension), extreme sensory sensitivities (to the point where they impair functioning), meltdowns, and stims (repetitive movements for self soothing, such as pinching, rocking, arm-flapping, etc.).
Hit all these markers and you’re pretty likely on the spectrum. But now it seems as though people pick one or two of those traits and call it autism when it’s probably some other psychological disorder, or even a host of them. This assertion also precludes testing to see what those other disorders might be.
At this point, the phrase “who cares?” does pop up in my head as it has in the past. And indeed I really don’t care who chooses to call themselves autistic because it’s not like neurotypicals can tell the difference anyway.
What I do care about, though, is that there aren’t a lot of resources available to help autistic people and we already have to fight to get them at work, particularly those of us who seem to function well, or at least well enough, to not need accommodations. However, I do need considerable accommodations at work in order to function, and can only work part-time because full-time would be too many hours of hiding my autism from other people.
That’s another one of my hard lines on autism right there. If your autism is to the point where your options are masking (hiding) it or social ostracism, I’d take that as pretty likely to be autistic. And I don’t mean the small things (or even some big ones) we keep to ourselves to remain within the boundaries of our social contract.
I mean the kind of autism where people look at you funny and don’t understand you or why you’re talking is so loud and weird and they withdraw unexpectedly like you’re a rabid animal and you never find out why. The kind where you have to change how you speak, your face, eye contact, your body movement, everything to hide your autistic traits. The kind of sensory sensitivities that are so upsetting they can lead to meltdowns if you don’t get away from them. That kind of autism.
I worry that the more ‘maybe/maybe not’ autistic people (diagnosed by someone who isn’t qualified to make that diagnosis) ask for accommodations, the more the label autism gets diluted, such that people like me have more and more trouble getting accommodations. Like “well, so-and-so is autistic and they can still work full time, so why can’t you?” Or, “so-and-so is autistic and they’re fine with noisy environments, why aren’t you?” And so on.
I don’t mean to belittle people who haven’t been diagnosed but are still obviously autistic. I do still believe that self-diagnosis can happen.
But there are many other things that contain some symptoms of autism but not others, and that does not a diagnosis of autism make.
ADHD, profound anxiety, sensory sensitivity, depression, and more serious personality disorders can be harder to diagnose and harder to treat. If a therapist or social worker tells someone they’re autistic because of a few traits that seem to match, that person may be deprived of treatment that would help them with these other conditions. There is no treatment for autism, as it is not a disease. It is a physiological difference, like red hair or being left-handed. One can only treat the symptoms.
It’s one thing to call yourself autistic. It’s another to be diagnosed by a medical professional who might be mistaken which results in outcomes that aren’t the best thing for the patient, or for someone to misrepresent autism such that non-autistic people take it less seriously then they should.
I know this is inflammatory and I am expecting comments disagreeing with me to come raining down as soon as I post this. But this is how I feel as a professionally diagnosed autistic with real challenges that are both pyschological and physical. I’ve worked hard to raise awareness of what autism is and how important accommodations are for autistics. So I’m drawing a line in the sand here where I previously didn’t, because, as always, that’s what I feel will benefit the most truly autistic people.







